Senator Lacson Calls for End to Kalayaan Island Group Debate, Citing Risks to Residents
Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo "Ping" Lacson has made a public appeal to retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio and University of the Philippines Professor Jay Batongbacal, urging them not to participate in a proposed debate on the Kalayaan Island Group (KIG). The debate was initiated by Senator Rodante Marcoleta, but Lacson argues it could create unnecessary alarm and potentially compromise the residential rights of inhabitants in Barangay Pag-asa, Palawan.
Debate Labeled as "Pointless" and Potentially Harmful
Lacson described the planned discussion as a "pointless debate" that might place long-time Filipino residents of the island in a precarious position. He emphasized that any discourse threatening the stability and rights of these communities should be avoided, especially since the Philippines firmly recognizes its sovereignty over the territory.
Justice Carpio has accepted Marcoleta's challenge for a "friendly debate" focusing on sovereignty and maritime security, while Batongbacal is also among the invited participants. This development follows Marcoleta's earlier controversial suggestion that the Philippines might consider surrendering the KIG, claiming it lies outside the country's exclusive economic zone—a statement that raised concerns among several senators and experts.
Background and Broader Implications
Lacson's remarks were made public on February 4, 2026, during a Commission on Appointments deliberation involving 35 senior officers of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. The Kalayaan Island Group is part of the West Philippine Sea, a region long disputed between the Philippines and China.
According to Lacson, debates that jeopardize resident rights are counterproductive, given the clear Philippine stance on territorial sovereignty. He stressed that such discussions could undermine national interests and destabilize the lives of those living in the area.
- The debate centers on maritime boundaries and sovereignty claims in a highly contested region.
- Residents of Barangay Pag-asa face potential uncertainty if the debate escalates tensions.
- Expert opinions from legal and academic circles are divided on the best approach to the issue.
This situation highlights the delicate balance between diplomatic discourse and the practical welfare of citizens in disputed territories. The outcome of this debate could influence future policy decisions and international relations in the West Philippine Sea.
